close

Evidence review summary

The Knowledge and Implementation Hub (the Hub) team conducted an evidence review of peer reviewed and grey literature to search and synthesise evidence on factors and strategies on aged care workforce retention. ARIIA aims to provide guidance to help the sector address workforce shortages and enhance retention that is crucial in delivering high-quality care for older Australians. This page provides a brief overview of the evidence review process and key findings. The full review will be available soon. 

What do the findings mean 

Understanding what drives aged care workers to stay or leave and which strategies help them stay, is critical for building a skilled and compassionate workforce. Workforce shortages and high turnover disrupts care, strains resources, and lowers morale. By focusing on the important factors and effective strategies, aged care providers can create safer, more consistent care environments for older adults and reduce the ongoing costs and challenges of replacing staff. However, it is also important to understand local context factors to develop tailored strategies for effective implementation. 

What we did 

We searched relevant research on aged care workforce retention. Our search focused on peer-reviewed studies from the last ten years and grey literature (like reports or policy documents) from the last five years. We targeted literature that explored both factors on retention and strategies taken to improve it. The review considered any factor or strategy that might affect how long staff stay, such training opportunities, leadership, support, workplace culture, and pay. The aged care workforce includes a wide range of roles nurses, personal care workers, allied health professionals and admin staff, in any aged care setting. The main outcome of interest was retention how long workers stay in their jobs but related outcomes such as turnover (degree of movement of individuals out of an organisation), intention to stay or leave (willingness to stay in the original organisation and not looking for other jobs; intention to leave is wanting to leave the organisation and actively seeking other jobs), and job satisfaction (worker’s positive feelings toward their job that makes them want to stay) were also included. 

We worked with the ARIIA Sector Reference Group (SRG) and the Guest Members who are experts in the area of workforce retention. The members provided expert insights in the review process, assisted in prioritising important factors to consider and guided the operationalisation of the evidence to help aged care providers improve staff retention and workforce staff to stay in their jobs. 

What we found 

Factors 

We identified 21 reviews and 46 primary studies (not included in the reviews) that considered factors in relation to retention and retention related outcomes. We grouped all the factors into similar themes, arriving at 32 factor themes. The top 10 priority factor themes identified by the SRG and Guest Members that are included in this report are: job control and autonomy, job satisfaction, leadership, salary, skill mix, staffing, training and opportunities, work and role clarity, workplace culture, and workplace relationships. 

The evidence from reviewed literature shows that workforce retention in the aged care sector is shaped by a mix of practical and interpersonal factors. [1] Staff are more likely to remain in their roles where their responsibilities are clear, they are trusted and valued, and they have the resources needed to do their jobs well. [2-4] When workloads are manageable and expectations are well defined, staff can focus on delivering quality care without unnecessary stress or confusion. [5, 6] 

In a sector already facing significant workforce challenges, failing to meet these basic staffing and organisational needs risks high turnover. Recent data show that the residential aged care workforce declined by over 45,000 between 2020 and 2023, which highlights the urgency of addressing staff retention to protect care quality for older Australians. [7] 

One of the most consistent findings is the impact of leadership on workforce retention. What matters is how well leaders communicate, whether they help create a positive, respectful work environment, and how they engage with staff in their daily work. [8-11] Organisations with supportive style of leadership tend to retain staff for longer. Leadership is also closely connected to how teams are structured. One critical factor is having the right balance of qualified staff - the right skill mix. [12, 13] When care workers are left without sufficient clinical support, the pressure increases, confidence drops, and the likelihood of staff leaving rises. [2, 3] Access to ongoing training and opportunities for professional development also emerged as a key factor in workforce retention, as it helps staff build confidence and see a future in the sector. [14, 15] 

Equally important as leadership, staffing, and development opportunities is job autonomy. Staff are more likely to stay when they can contribute to team decisions by offering professional judgement, and when they feel their input is valued. [9, 16] This sense of ownership strengthens their connection and commitment to the role. Importantly, a positive workplace culture supports this further, as a respectful, safe, collaborative, and inclusive environment – where staff experience a sense of belonging – is just as important as fair pay or predictable rosters. [17-19] Salary still matters, however, our findings show that remuneration alone does not determine intention to stay. [4, 20] Participants in the reviewed studies described their work as a meaningful form of service. [21]

In summary, workforce retention improves when leadership, adequate staffing, positive workplace culture, and opportunities for training and development support staff to do their jobs well. The challenge is not identifying what helps retain staff, as this is already clear. The next step is to translate this knowledge into consistent change across the sector. 

Strategies 

We identified 18 primary studies that assessed the impact of strategies on retention and retention related outcomes. We identified and grouped strategies into organisational strategies (focused on workplace systems), individual strategies (focused on personal development and wellbeing), and a mix of both. 

Organisational strategies included those that were about capacity building [22-28], leadership and support [29-31] and workplace culture engagement and enhancement.[32-34] Individual strategies included empowerment training to build communication skills and confidence,[35] and addressing emotional stress and techniques like mindfulness and self-compassion strategies. [36, 37] A combination of organisational and individual strategies included capacity building and health promotion techniques. [38, 39] 

Organisational strategies that focus on building the skills and capabilities of nurses and nursing assistants in residential aged care settings have consistently shown positive outcomes for staff retention [26-28] and intention to stay. [25, 27] These capacity-building approaches such as targeted training and professional development, appear to strengthen workforce engagement and stability in a sector where retention is a longstanding challenge. 

In contrast, other strategies have produced more variable results across different workforce groups and care settings. This implies that workforce retention strategies need to be tailored to the specific roles—whether nurses, nursing assistants, or care workers—and to the unique organisational structures and challenges present in each aged care environment. 

Aged care context

We identified about 65 articles from the grey literature search and 25 of these were Australian context specific. The majority of the grey literature were reports and articles focusing on the issues and challenges to keep workers stay in their jobs, the contextual factors affecting retention and possible strategies to address the ongoing retention challenges, very similar to the focus of the peer-reviewed literature. A broader understanding the Australian aged care context is key in understanding the factors and developing targeted and tailored retention strategies. 

The key themes around the aged care context from the grey literature include Australia’s ageing population, workforce demographics, perceptions of the industry, forms of discrimination, sector complexity, ongoing reforms and the use of technology and the need for skills training. [40-44] From these key themes, we present ways stakeholders can address the contextual factors. These include understanding the complex needs of the ageing population, supporting younger and mature workers’ needs, addressing ageism and other forms of discrimination, providing guidance to comply with reforms  and using technology to enhance work efficiency.  

  1. Thwaites C, McKercher JP, Fetherstonhaugh D, Blackberry I, Gilmartin-Thomas JF, Taylor NF, et al. Factors Impacting Retention of Aged Care Workers: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(23).
  2. Chamberlain SA, Hoben M, Squires JE, Estabrooks CA. Individual and organizational predictors of health care aide job satisfaction in long term care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):577.
  3. Schwendimann R, Dhaini S, Ausserhofer D, Engberg S, Zúñiga F. Factors associated with high job satisfaction among care workers in Swiss nursing homes - A cross sectional survey study. BMC Nurs. 2016;15(1).
  4. Radford K, Shacklock K, Bradley G. Personal care workers in Australian aged care: retention and turnover intentions. J Nurs Manag. 2015;23(5):557-66.
  5. Ruotsalainen S, Elovainio M, Jantunen S, Sinervo T. The mediating effect of psychosocial factors in the relationship between self-organizing teams and employee wellbeing: A cross-sectional observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023;138:104415.
  6. King D, Svensson S, Wei Z. Not always a quick fix: The impact of employing temporary agency workers on retention in the Australian aged care workforce. Journal of Industrial Relations. 2017;59(1):85-103.
  7. Welfare AIoHa. 2023 Aged Care Provider Workforce Survey: Report Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2024 [https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/resources/publications/2024/december/2023-aged-care-provider-workforce-survey-report; GEN 014].
  8. Dawes N, Topp SM. Senior manager leadership competencies for quality residential aged care: an Australian industry perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):508.
  9. Xie Y, Gu D, Liang C, Zhao S, Ma Y. How transformational leadership and clan culture influence nursing staff's willingness to stay. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(7):1515-24.
  10. Wong C, Walsh EJ, Basacco KN, Mendes Domingues MC, Pye DRH. Authentic leadership and job satisfaction among long-term care nurses. Leadersh Health Serv. 2020;33(3):247-63.
  11. Williams JAR, Collins JE, Gandhi A, Yu H, Boden LI, Katz JN, et al. Can Better Leadership Reduce Nursing Home Staff Turnover? J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024;25(3):403-7.e1.
  12. Nankervis A, Connell J, Fitzgerald S, Burgess J. Attracting and retaining personal care assistants into the Western Australia (WA) residential aged care sector. Labour and Industry. 2017;27(4):333-49.
  13. Xerri M, Brunetto Y, Farr-Wharton B. Support for aged care workers and quality care in Australia: A case of contract failure? Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2019;78(4):546-61.
  14. McCabe MP, Beattie E, Karantzas G, Mellor D, Sanders K, Busija L, et al. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a staff training program to implement consumer directed care on resident quality of life in residential aged care. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):287.
  15. Hsu W, Shih FP. Key Factors for Enhancing Home Care Workers' Intention to Stay by Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(5).
  16. Chao SF, Lu PC. Differences in determinants of intention to stay and retention between younger and older nursing assistants in long-term care facilities: A longitudinal perspective. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(3):522-31.
  17. Johnston L, Malcolm C, Rambabu L, Hockley J, Shenkin SD. Practice Based Approaches to Supporting the Work Related Wellbeing of Frontline Care Workers in Care Homes: A Scoping Review. Journal of Long-Term Care. 2021;2021:230-40.
  18. Karmacharya I, Janssen LM, Brekke B. "Let Them Know That They're Appreciated": The Importance of Work Culture on Direct Care Worker Retention. J Gerontol Nurs. 2023;49(8):7-13.
  19. Dys S, Tunalilar O, Hasworth S, Winfree J, White DL. Person-centered care practices in nursing homes: Staff perceptions and the organizational environment. Geriatr Nurs. 2022;43:188-96.
  20. Rahnfeld M, Wendsche J, Ihle A, Müller SR, Kliegel M. Uncovering the care setting-turnover intention relationship of geriatric nurses. Eur J Ageing. 2016;13(2):159-69.
  21. Adebayo B, Nichols P, Heslop K, Brijnath B. A Scoping Review of Dementia Care Experiences in Migrant Aged Care Workforce. Gerontologist. 2020;60(2):e105-e16.
  22. Beck I, Jakobsson U, Edberg AK. Applying a palliative care approach in residential care: effects on nurse assistants' work situation. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(3):543-53.
  23. Leontjevas R, Hooijschuur L, Smalbrugge M, Koopmans R, Gerritsen DL. Specific components of a complex depression care program can affect staff outcomes differently: post-hoc analyses of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial in nursing homes. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020;32(3):371-80.
  24. Jung D, De Gagne JC, Lee M, Lee H. The effect of function-focused care on long-term care workers in South Korea. Geriatr Nurs. 2020;41(5):629-34.
  25. Zwijsen SA, Gerritsen DL, Eefsting JA, Smalbrugge M, Hertogh CM, Pot AM. Coming to grips with challenging behaviour: a cluster randomised controlled trial on the effects of a new care programme for challenging behaviour on burnout, job satisfaction and job demands of care staff on dementia special care units. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):68-74.
  26. Jordan KJ, Tsai PF, Heo S, Bai S, Dailey D, Beck C, et al. Feasibility of testing a coaching training intervention for CNAs in nursing homes. Geriatr Nurs. 2018;39(6):702-8.
  27. Neller S, Beynon C, McLeskey N, Madden C, Edelman LS. Development of a Long-Term Care Nurse Residency Program. J Gerontol Nurs. 2021;47(2):37-43.
  28. Traynor V, Britten N, Gibson D, Munk S, Chenoweth L, Stokes J, et al. Implementing a gerontological nursing competencies programme in aged care: Participant experiences. Int Nurs Rev. 2024.
  29. André B, Jacobsen FF, Haugan G. How is leadership experienced in joy-of-life-nursing-homes compared to ordinary nursing homes: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1).
  30. Jeon YH, Simpson JM, Li Z, Cunich MM, Thomas TH, Chenoweth L, et al. Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of An Aged Care Specific Leadership and Management Program to Improve Work Environment, Staff Turnover, and Care Quality. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(7):629.e19-28.
  31. McGilton KS, Krassikova A, Wills A, Bethell J, Boscart V, Escrig-Pinol A, et al. Nurse practitioner led implementation of huddles for staff in long term care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):713.
  32. Guzmán A, Wenborn J, Swinson T, Orrell M. Evaluation of the 'Ladder to the Moon, Culture Change Studio Engagement Programme' staff training: Two quasi-experimental case studies. Int J Older People Nurs. 2017;12(3).
  33. Weale VP, Wells YD, Oakman J. Flexible working arrangements in residential aged care: applying a person–environment fit model. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2017;55(3):356-74.
  34. Wynendaele H, Gemmel P, Peeters E, Myny D, Trybou J. The effect of self-scheduling on organizational justice and work attitudes through leader-member exchange: A cross-sectional study using propensity scores. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;122.
  35. van Wieringen M, Kee K, Gobbens RJJ, Nies H, Beersma B, Groenewegen P. Exploring crucial programme characteristics and group mechanisms of an empowerment programme for certified nursing assistants-A qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(9):2949-59.
  36. Bluth K, Lathren C, Silbersack Hickey JVT, Zimmerman S, Wretman CJ, Sloane PD. Self-compassion training for certified nurse assistants in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(7):1896-905.
  37. Dreher MM, Hughes RG, Handley PA, Tavakoli AS. Improving Retention Among Certified Nursing Assistants Through Compassion Fatigue Awareness and Self-Care Skills Education. J Holist Nurs. 2019;37(3):296-308.
  38. Barbosa A, Nolan M, Sousa L, Marques A, Figueiredo D. Effects of a Psychoeducational Intervention for Direct Care Workers Caring for People with Dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016;31(2):144-55.
  39. Lamas K, Bolenius K, Sandman PO, Lindkvist M, Edvardsson D. Effects of a person-centred and health-promoting intervention in home care services- a non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):720.
  40. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older Australians [Internet]. Canberra: AIHW; 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 7]. Available from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australians/contents/summary 
  41. National Skills Commission. Care workforce labour market study: final report. Canberra: National Skills Commission; 2021. 475 p.
  42. The Conversation. We need to talk about dirty work, and what it’s worth [internet]. 2013 [cited 2025 July 8]. Available from https://theconversation.com/hang-on-australian-randd-doesnt-punch-above-its-weight-12641
  43. Australian Association of Gerontology. Essential capabilities for managing an aged care workforce. Melbourne: AAG; 2024. Available from https://aag.asn.au/libraryviewer?ResourceID=266
  44. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation. Building, training and supporting the aged care workforce. Melbourne: ANMF; 2022. 19 p. Available from https://www.anmf.org.au/media/40kftw4w/anmf_submission_building_training_and_supporting_the_aged_care_workforce.pdf
Spacing Top
0
Spacing Bottom
0